Welcome to Anagrammer Crossword Genius! Keep reading below to see if refutabl is an answer to any crossword puzzle or word game (Scrabble, Words With Friends etc). Scroll down to see all the info we have compiled on refutabl.
refutabl
Searching in Crosswords ...
The answer REFUTABL has 0 possible clue(s) in existing crosswords.
Searching in Word Games ...
The word REFUTABL is NOT valid in any word game. (Sorry, you cannot play REFUTABL in Scrabble, Words With Friends etc)
There are 8 letters in REFUTABL ( A1B3E1F4L1R1T1U1 )
To search all scrabble anagrams of REFUTABL, to go: REFUTABL?
Rearrange the letters in REFUTABL and see some winning combinations
5 letters out of REFUTABL
4 letters out of REFUTABL
3 letters out of REFUTABL
Searching in Dictionaries ...
Definitions of refutabl in various dictionaries:
REFUTABL - A statement, hypothesis, or theory has falsifiability (or is falsifiable) if it is contradicted by a basic statement, which, in an eventual successf...
Word Research / Anagrams and more ...
Keep reading for additional results and analysis below.
Refutabl might refer to |
---|
A statement, hypothesis, or theory has Falsifiability (or is falsifiable) if it is contradicted by a basic statement, which, in an eventual successful or failed falsification must respectively correspond to a true or hypothetical observation. For example, the claim "all swans are white" is falsifiable since it is contradicted by this basic statement: "In 1697, during the Dutch explorer Willem de Vlamingh expedition, there were black swans on the shore of the Swan River in Australia", which in this case is a true observation. The concept is also known by the terms refutable and refutability. * The concept was introduced by the philosopher of science Karl Popper. He saw falsifiability as the logical part and the cornerstone of his scientific epistemology, which sets the limits of scientific inquiry. He proposed that statements and theories that are not falsifiable are unscientific. Declaring an unfalsifiable theory to be scientific would then be pseudoscience. |