Welcome to Anagrammer Crossword Genius! Keep reading below to see if retracte is an answer to any crossword puzzle or word game (Scrabble, Words With Friends etc). Scroll down to see all the info we have compiled on retracte.
retracte
Searching in Crosswords ...
The answer RETRACTE has 0 possible clue(s) in existing crosswords.
Searching in Word Games ...
The word RETRACTE is NOT valid in any word game. (Sorry, you cannot play RETRACTE in Scrabble, Words With Friends etc)
There are 8 letters in RETRACTE ( A1C3E1R1T1 )
To search all scrabble anagrams of RETRACTE, to go: RETRACTE?
Rearrange the letters in RETRACTE and see some winning combinations
Scrabble results that can be created with an extra letter added to RETRACTE
6 letters out of RETRACTE
5 letters out of RETRACTE
4 letters out of RETRACTE
3 letters out of RETRACTE
Searching in Dictionaries ...
Definitions of retracte in various dictionaries:
RETRACTE - "Severe dopaminergic neurotoxicity in primates after a common recreational dose regimen of MDMA ("ecstasy")", was a paper by Dr. George Ricaurte whic...
Word Research / Anagrams and more ...
Keep reading for additional results and analysis below.
Retracte might refer to |
---|
"Severe dopaminergic neurotoxicity in primates after a common recreational dose regimen of MDMA ("ecstasy")", was a paper by Dr. George Ricaurte which was published in the leading journal Science, and later retracted. The reason was that instead of using MDMA, methamphetamine had been used in the test.The retraction of the paper led to questions over its publication. It has also been asserted that this questions the peer review process. * Many have also argued that the failings in the paper (use of materials other than those specified) could not have been caught by peer review; and that the scientific process did work successfully in the end, in that the article was ultimately retracted. * The paper was published in the 27 September 2002 issue of Science (volume 297, pages 2260-3). The article had been submitted to Science on 29 May 2002 and was accepted for publication on 14 August 2002. Neither the time required for peer review nor the time between acceptance for publication and actual date of publication were unusual. |