Welcome to Anagrammer Crossword Genius! Keep reading below to see if vaguene is an answer to any crossword puzzle or word game (Scrabble, Words With Friends etc). Scroll down to see all the info we have compiled on vaguene.
VAGUENE
Searching in Crosswords ...
The answer VAGUENE has 0 possible clue(s) in existing crosswords.
Searching in Word Games ...
The word VAGUENE is NOT valid in any word game. (Sorry, you cannot play VAGUENE in Scrabble, Words With Friends etc)
Searching in Dictionaries ...
Definitions of vaguene in various dictionaries:
VAGUENE - In philosophy, vagueness refers to an important problem in semantics, metaphysics and philosophical logic. Definitions of vagueness vary but track a ...
Word Research / Anagrams and more ...
- check VAGUENE in all word games (47 answers)
- unscramble VAGUENE (59 answers)
- anagrams of VAGUENE (11 answers)
- words containing VAGUENE (2 answers)
- words starting with VAGUENE (2 answers)
- words ending with VAGUENE (0 answers)
- synonyms of VAGUENE (0 answers)
- antonyms of VAGUENE (0 answers)
Keep reading for additional results and analysis below.
| Vaguene might refer to |
|---|
|
In philosophy, vagueness refers to an important problem in semantics, metaphysics and philosophical logic. Definitions of vagueness vary but track a related strain of intuitions about a property that many ordinary words seem to share. A predicate is sometimes said to be vague if the bound of its extension is indeterminate, or appears to be so. The predicate "is tall" is vague because there appears to be no particular height at which a person becomes tall, even relative to a given population. Relatedly, a predicate is sometimes said to be vague if there are borderline cases of its application, such that competent speakers of the language may faultlessly disagree over whether the predicate applies. The disagreement over whether a hotdog is a sandwich suggests that “sandwich” is vague. * Vagueness is most commonly introduced per the Sorites paradox. A standard form of this paradox features a 2000 man sequence of progressively taller men, starting with a paradigm case of a short man at one extreme, say George Costanza, and at the other extreme, a paradigm case of a tall one, say Kramer. * Base step: Man 1 (George Costanza) is short. * Induction step: If man n is short, then man n + 1 is short. * Conclusion: Man 2000 (Kramer) is short.Sorites paradoxes exploit the intuition that some vague predicates are tolerant with respect to small enough differences on a dimension decisive of their application. This may seem to be so because no particular height seems to be justified as a cut-off for shortness. This intuition has been called the No Sharp Boundaries thesis about vague predicates and plays a prominent role in theories of vagueness. * The problem posed by vagueness is to explain its particular kind of indeterminacy. Does vagueness render large portions of ordinary language meaningless? Likely not, since we frequently use vague language to great effect. If not, what is vagueness, at the level of predicate logic? How is it to be modelled without contradiction, and without sacrificing too much of classical logic? Is vagueness semantic, metaphysical or epistemic? * Vagueness has in its own right reaped the attention of an extensive literature. In addition, vagueness is a topic that touches many other questions in philosophy, linguistics and cognitive science, not to mention ordinary discourse. * * |
WAS THIS PAGE HELPFUL? Grab a CITATION
https://www.anagrammer.com/crossword/answer/vaguene