Crossword Solver > found answer > CIRCULARLOGIC

Welcome to Anagrammer Crossword Genius! Keep reading below to see if circularlogic is an answer to any crossword puzzle or word game (Scrabble, Words With Friends etc). Scroll down to see all the info we have compiled on circularlogic.

CROSSWORD
ANSWER

circularlogic

Searching in Crosswords ...

The answer CIRCULARLOGIC has 2 possible clue(s) in existing crosswords.

Searching in Word Games ...

The word CIRCULARLOGIC is NOT valid in any word game. (Sorry, you cannot play CIRCULARLOGIC in Scrabble, Words With Friends etc)

Searching in Dictionaries ...

Definitions of circularlogic in various dictionaries:

No definitions found

Word Research / Anagrams and more ...

Keep reading for additional results and analysis below.

Possible Crossword Clues
Kind of faulty reasoning
Begging the question

Last Seen in these Crosswords & Puzzles
Jul 3 2016 L.A. Times Daily
Nov 15 2009 Premier Sunday - King Feature Syndicate

Circularlogic might refer to
Circular reasoning (Latin: circulus in probando, "circle in proving"; also known as circular logic) is a logical fallacy in which the reasoner begins with what they are trying to end with. The components of a circular argument are often logically valid because if the premises are true, the conclusion must be true. Circular reasoning is not a formal logical fallacy but a pragmatic defect in an argument whereby the premises are just as much in need of proof or evidence as the conclusion, and as a consequence the argument fails to persuade. Other ways to express this are that there is no reason to accept the premises unless one already believes the conclusion, or that the premises provide no independent ground or evidence for the conclusion. Begging the question is closely related to circular reasoning, and in modern usage the two generally refer to the same thing.Circular reasoning is often of the form: "A is true because B is true; B is true because A is true." Circularity can be difficult to detect if it involves a longer chain of propositions. * Academic Douglas Walton used the following example of a fallacious circular argument:* Wellington is in New Zealand. * Therefore, Wellington is in New Zealand.He notes that, although the argument is deductively valid, it cannot prove that Wellington is in New Zealand because it contains no evidence that is distinct from the conclusion. The context – that of an argument – means that the proposition does not meet the requirement of proving the statement; thus, it is a fallacy. He proposes that the context of a dialogue determines whether a circular argument is fallacious: if it forms part of an argument, then it is. Citing Cederblom and Paulsen 1986:109, Hugh G. Gauch observes that non-logical facts can be difficult to capture formally: * * 'Whatever is less dense than water will float, because whatever is less dense than water will float' sounds stupid, but 'Whatever is less dense than water will float, because such objects won't sink in water' might pass.

Circularlogic might refer to

Circular reasoning (Latin: circulus in probando, "circle in proving"; also known as circular logic) is a logical fallacy in which the reasoner begins with what they are trying to end with. The components of a circular argument are often logically valid because if the premises are true, the conclusion must be true. Circular reasoning is not a formal logical fallacy but a pragmatic defect in an argument whereby the premises are just as much in need of proof or evidence as the conclusion, and as a consequence the argument fails to persuade. Other ways to express this are that there is no reason to accept the premises unless one already believes the conclusion, or that the premises provide no independent ground or evidence for the conclusion. Begging the question is closely related to circular reasoning, and in modern usage the two generally refer to the same thing.Circular reasoning is often of the form: "A is true because B is true; B is true because A is true." Circularity can be difficult to detect if it involves a longer chain of propositions.
* Academic Douglas Walton used the following example of a fallacious circular argument:* Wellington is in New Zealand.
* Therefore, Wellington is in New Zealand.He notes that, although the argument is deductively valid, it cannot prove that Wellington is in New Zealand because it contains no evidence that is distinct from the conclusion. The context – that of an argument – means that the proposition does not meet the requirement of proving the statement; thus, it is a fallacy. He proposes that the context of a dialogue determines whether a circular argument is fallacious: if it forms part of an argument, then it is. Citing Cederblom and Paulsen 1986:109, Hugh G. Gauch observes that non-logical facts can be difficult to capture formally:
*
* 'Whatever is less dense than water will float, because whatever is less dense than water will float' sounds stupid, but 'Whatever is less dense than water will float, because such objects won't sink in water' might pass.

Anagrammer Crossword Solver is a powerful crossword puzzle resource site. We maintain millions of regularly updated crossword solutions, clues and answers of almost every popular crossword puzzle and word game out there. We encourage you to bookmark our puzzle solver as well as the other word solvers throughout our site. Explore deeper into our site and you will find many educational tools, flash cards and plenty more resources that will make you a much better player. This page shows you that Kind of faulty reasoning is a possible clue for circularlogic. You can also see that this clue and answer has appeared in these newspapers and magazines: July 3 2016 L.A. Times Daily, November 15 2009 Premier Sunday - King Feature Syndicate . Circularlogic: Circular reasoning (Latin: circulus in probando, "circle in proving"; also known as circular logic) ...