Welcome to Anagrammer Crossword Genius! Keep reading below to see if resealed is an answer to any crossword puzzle or word game (Scrabble, Words With Friends etc). Scroll down to see all the info we have compiled on resealed.
resealed
Searching in Crosswords ...
The answer RESEALED has 9 possible clue(s) in existing crosswords.
Searching in Word Games ...
The word RESEALED is VALID in some board games. Check RESEALED in word games in Scrabble, Words With Friends, see scores, anagrams etc.
Searching in Dictionaries ...
Definitions of resealed in various dictionaries:
verb - seal again
adj - to close or make secure against access, leakage, or passage [v -ED, -ING, -S] : SEALABLE
Word Research / Anagrams and more ...
Keep reading for additional results and analysis below.
| Possible Crossword Clues |
|---|
| Twice-secured |
| Closed after use |
| Zipped again, as a storage bag |
| Applied more caulk |
| Made more waterproof |
| Glued shut again |
| closed again |
| Closed again, as an envelope |
| Resealed might refer to |
|---|
|
In re: Sealed Case No. 02-001, 310 F.3d 717 (2002), is a per curiam decision by the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review in which it reviewed restrictions that were placed upon a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) application by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) on May 17, 2002. The Court of Review reversed the FISC's restrictions, stating that they "are not required by FISA or the Constitution". This opinion represents the first meeting of and first opinion by the Court of Review. For the purposes of review, the FISC's modification of the requested application worked as a "denial", thus giving the Court of Review jurisdiction to take the case. * The Court noted that the case raised important questions of statutory interpretation and the constitutionality of provision of FISA. In particular, the opinion addressed changes made in the act due to the passage of the Patriot Act. The Court addressed these questions in the context of a single request for an order authorizing electronic surveillance made by the government to the FISC. The FISC approved the requested order but "imposed certain requirements and limitations" on the government. The government appealed to the Court of Review. * The Court first stated that there appeared to be no disagreement between the government and the FISC as to the propriety of the requested surveillance because the FISC found that the government had shown probable caused to believe that the target is an agent of a foreign power. The government therefore only appealed the restrictions imposed. The restrictions include orders that* law enforcement officials shall not make recommendations to intelligence officials concerning the initiation, operation, continuation or expansion of FISA searches or surveillances. Additionally, the FBI and the Criminal Division [of the Department of Justice] shall ensure that law enforcement officials do not direct or control the use of the FISA procedures to enhance criminal prosecution, and that advice intended to preserve the option of a criminal prosecution does not inadvertently result in the Criminal Division’s directing or controlling the investigation using FISA searches and surveillances toward law enforcement objectives. * The FISC also created what the court referred to as a "chaperone requirement", which required that a unit of the Justice Department (the Office of Intelligence Policy and review (OIPR)) "be invited" to all meetings between the FBI and the Criminal Division involving coordination of efforts to investigate and respond to potential hostile acts. The Court of Review stated that the lower opinion establishing these restrictions did not clearly set forth the basis for its decision. Instead, the restrictions "appear[] to proceed from the assumption that FISA constructed a barrier between counterintelligence/intelligence officials and law enforcement officers in the Executive Branch," but the opinion did not sup... |