×
×
How many letters in the Answer?

Welcome to Anagrammer Crossword Genius! Keep reading below to see if rgents is an answer to any crossword puzzle or word game (Scrabble, Words With Friends etc). Scroll down to see all the info we have compiled on rgents.

CROSSWORD
ANSWER

rgents

Searching in Crosswords ...

The answer RGENTS has 0 possible clue(s) in existing crosswords.

Searching in Word Games ...

The word RGENTS is NOT valid in any word game. (Sorry, you cannot play RGENTS in Scrabble, Words With Friends etc)

There are 6 letters in RGENTS ( E1G2N1R1S1T1 )

To search all scrabble anagrams of RGENTS, to go: RGENTS?

Rearrange the letters in RGENTS and see some winning combinations

Dictionary
Game

note: word points are shown in red

Scrabble results that can be created with an extra letter added to RGENTS

2 letters out of RGENTS

Searching in Dictionaries ...

Definitions of rgents in various dictionaries:

No definitions found

Word Research / Anagrams and more ...


Keep reading for additional results and analysis below.

Rgents might refer to
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978), was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States. It upheld affirmative action, allowing race to be one of several factors in college admission policy. However, the court ruled that specific racial quotas, such as the 16 out of 100 seats set aside for minority students by the University of California, Davis School of Medicine, were impermissible.
* Although the Supreme Court had outlawed segregation in schools, and had even ordered school districts to take steps to assure integration, the question of the legality of voluntary affirmative action programs initiated by universities remained unresolved. Proponents deemed such programs necessary to make up for past discrimination, while opponents believed they were illegal and a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. An earlier case that the Supreme Court had taken in an attempt to address the issue, DeFunis v. Odegaard (1974), was dismissed on procedural grounds.
* Allan P. Bakke (), an engineer and former United States Marine Corps officer, sought admission to medical school, but was rejected for admission by several due in part to his age. Bakke was in his early 30s while applying, and therefore considered too old by at least two institutions. After twice being rejected by the University of California, Davis, he brought suit in state court. The California Supreme Court struck down the program as violative of the rights of white applicants and ordered Bakke admitted. The U.S. Supreme Court accepted the case amid wide public attention.
* The case fractured the court; the nine justices issued a total of six opinions. The judgment of the court was written by Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr.; two different blocs of four justices joined various parts of Powell's opinion. Finding diversity in the classroom to be a compelling state interest, Powell opined that affirmative action in general was allowed under the Constitution and the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Nevertheless, UC Davis's program went too far for a majority of justices, and it was struck down and Bakke admitted. The practical effect of Bakke was that most affirmative action programs continued without change. Questions about whether the Bakke case was merely a plurality opinion or binding precedent were answered in 2003 when the court upheld Powell's position in a majority opinion in Grutter v. Bollinger.
Anagrammer Crossword Solver is a powerful crossword puzzle resource site. We maintain millions of regularly updated crossword solutions, clues and answers of almost every popular crossword puzzle and word game out there. We encourage you to bookmark our puzzle solver as well as the other word solvers throughout our site. Explore deeper into our site and you will find many educational tools, flash cards and plenty more resources that will make you a much better player. Rgents: Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978), was a landmark decision by th...